PALO ALTO NETWORKS PSE-STRATA-PRO-24 EXAM | DOWNLOAD PSE-STRATA-PRO-24 PDF - ONE YEAR FREE UPDATES OF PSE-STRATA-PRO-24 PDF

Palo Alto Networks PSE-Strata-Pro-24 Exam | Download PSE-Strata-Pro-24 Pdf - One Year Free Updates of PSE-Strata-Pro-24 PDF

Palo Alto Networks PSE-Strata-Pro-24 Exam | Download PSE-Strata-Pro-24 Pdf - One Year Free Updates of PSE-Strata-Pro-24 PDF

Blog Article

Tags: Download PSE-Strata-Pro-24 Pdf, PSE-Strata-Pro-24 PDF, PSE-Strata-Pro-24 Books PDF, PSE-Strata-Pro-24 Test Fee, PSE-Strata-Pro-24 Valid Exam Cost

In this way, you can clear all your doubts and understand each topic well. Palo Alto Networks Dumps PDF are customizable and simulate the real Palo Alto Networks Systems Engineer Professional - Hardware Firewall (PSE-Strata-Pro-24) test scenario. The desktop-based PSE-Strata-Pro-24 Practice Exam software works on Windows. The web-based PSE-Strata-Pro-24 practice exam is compatible with all operating systems and browsers.

Palo Alto Networks PSE-Strata-Pro-24 Exam Syllabus Topics:

TopicDetails
Topic 1
  • Network Security Strategy and Best Practices: This section of the exam measures the skills of Security Strategy Specialists and highlights the importance of the Palo Alto Networks five-step Zero Trust methodology. Candidates must understand how to approach and apply the Zero Trust model effectively while emphasizing best practices to ensure robust network security.
Topic 2
  • Business Value and Competitive Differentiators: This section of the exam measures the skills of Technical Business Value Analysts and focuses on identifying the value proposition of Palo Alto Networks Next-Generation Firewalls (NGFWs). Candidates will assess the technical business benefits of tools like Panorama and SCM. They will also recognize customer-relevant topics and align them with Palo Alto Networks' best solutions. Additionally, understanding Strata’s unique differentiators is a key component of this domain.
Topic 3
  • Architecture and Planning: This section of the exam measures the skills of Network Architects and emphasizes understanding customer requirements and designing suitable deployment architectures. Candidates must explain Palo Alto Networks' platform networking capabilities in detail and evaluate their suitability for various environments. Handling aspects like system sizing and fine-tuning is also a critical skill assessed in this domain.
Topic 4
  • Deployment and Evaluation: This section of the exam measures the skills of Deployment Engineers and focuses on identifying the capabilities of Palo Alto Networks NGFWs. Candidates will evaluate features that protect against both known and unknown threats. They will also explain identity management from a deployment perspective and describe the proof of value (PoV) process, which includes assessing the effectiveness of NGFW solutions.

>> Download PSE-Strata-Pro-24 Pdf <<

Palo Alto Networks PSE-Strata-Pro-24 PDF - PSE-Strata-Pro-24 Books PDF

The system of PSE-Strata-Pro-24 test guide will keep track of your learning progress in the whole course. Therefore, you can have 100% confidence in our PSE-Strata-Pro-24 exam guide. According to our overall evaluation and research, seldom do we have cases that customers fail the PSE-Strata-Pro-24 exam after using our study materials. But to relieve your doubts about failure in the test, we guarantee you a full refund from our company by virtue of the related proof of your report card. Of course you can freely change another PSE-Strata-Pro-24 Exam Guide to prepare for the next exam. Generally speaking, our company takes account of every client’ difficulties with fitting solutions.

Palo Alto Networks Systems Engineer Professional - Hardware Firewall Sample Questions (Q51-Q56):

NEW QUESTION # 51
Which statement applies to the default configuration of a Palo Alto Networks NGFW?

  • A. Security profiles are applied to all policies by default, eliminating implicit trust of any data traversing the firewall.
  • B. The default policy action for intrazone traffic is deny, eliminating implicit trust within a security zone.
  • C. The default policy action for interzone traffic is deny, eliminating implicit trust between security zones.
  • D. The default policy action allows all traffic unless explicitly denied.

Answer: C

Explanation:
The default configuration of a Palo Alto Networks NGFW includes a set of default security rules that determine how traffic is handled when no explicit rules are defined. Here's the explanation for each option:
* Option A: Security profiles are applied to all policies by default, eliminating implicit trust of any data traversing the firewall
* Security profiles (such as Antivirus, Anti-Spyware, and URL Filtering) are not applied to any policies by default. Administrators must explicitly apply them to security rules.
* This statement is incorrect.
* Option B: The default policy action for intrazone traffic is deny, eliminating implicit trust within a security zone
* By default, traffic within the same zone (intrazone traffic) isallowed. For example, traffic between devices in the "trust" zone is permitted unless explicitly denied by an administrator.
* This statement is incorrect.
* Option C: The default policy action allows all traffic unless explicitly denied
* Palo Alto Networks firewalls do not have an "allow all" default rule. Instead, they include a default "deny all" rule for interzone traffic and an implicit "allow" rule for intrazone traffic.
* This statement is incorrect.
* Option D: The default policy action for interzone traffic is deny, eliminating implicit trust between security zones
* By default, traffic between different zones (interzone traffic) is denied. This aligns with the principle of zero trust, ensuring that no traffic is implicitly allowed between zones.
Administrators must define explicit rules to allow interzone traffic.
* This statement is correct.
References:
* Palo Alto Networks documentation on Security Policy Defaults
* Knowledge Base article on Default Security Rules


NEW QUESTION # 52
Which three descriptions apply to a perimeter firewall? (Choose three.)

  • A. Network layer protection for the outer edge of a network
  • B. Guarding against external attacks
  • C. Primarily securing north-south traffic entering and leaving the network
  • D. Power utilization less than 500 watts sustained
  • E. Securing east-west traffic in a virtualized data center with flexible resource allocation

Answer: A,B,C

Explanation:
Aperimeter firewallis traditionally deployed at the boundary of a network to protect it from external threats.
It provides a variety of protections, including blocking unauthorized access, inspecting traffic flows, and safeguarding sensitive resources. Here is how the options apply:
* Option A (Correct):Perimeter firewalls providenetwork layer protectionby filtering and inspecting traffic entering or leaving the network at the outer edge. This is one of their primary roles.
* Option B:Power utilization is not a functional or architectural aspect of a firewall and is irrelevant when describing the purpose of a perimeter firewall.
* Option C:Securing east-west traffic is more aligned withdata center firewalls, whichmonitor lateral (east-west) movement of traffic within a virtualized or segmented environment. A perimeter firewall focuses on north-south traffic instead.
* Option D (Correct):A perimeter firewall primarily securesnorth-south traffic, which refers to traffic entering and leaving the network. It ensures that inbound and outbound traffic adheres to security policies.
* Option E (Correct):Perimeter firewalls play a critical role inguarding against external attacks, such as DDoS attacks, malicious IP traffic, and other unauthorized access attempts.
References:
* Palo Alto Networks Firewall Deployment Use Cases: https://docs.paloaltonetworks.com
* Security Reference Architecture for North-South Traffic Control.


NEW QUESTION # 53
A large global company plans to acquire 500 NGFWs to replace its legacy firewalls and has a specific requirement for centralized logging and reporting capabilities.
What should a systems engineer recommend?

  • A. Use Panorama for firewall management and to transfer logs from the 500 firewalls directly to a third- party SIEM for centralized logging and reporting.
  • B. Deploy a pair of M-1000 log collectors in the customer data center, and route logs from all 500 firewalls to the log collectors for centralized logging and reporting.
  • C. Highlight the efficiency of PAN-OS, which employs AI to automatically extract critical logs and generate daily executive reports, and confirm that the purchase of 500 NGFWs is sufficient.
  • D. Combine Panorama for firewall management with Palo Alto Networks' cloud-based Strata Logging Service to offer scalability for the company's logging and reporting infrastructure.

Answer: D

Explanation:
A large deployment of 500 firewalls requires a scalable, centralized logging and reporting infrastructure.
Here's the analysis of each option:
* Option A: Combine Panorama for firewall management with Palo Alto Networks' cloud-based Strata Logging Service to offer scalability for the company's logging and reporting infrastructure
* TheStrata Logging Service(or Cortex Data Lake) is a cloud-based solution that offers massive scalability for logging and reporting. Combined with Panorama, it allows for centralized log collection, analysis, and policy management without the need for extensive on-premises infrastructure.
* This approach is ideal for large-scale environments like the one described in the scenario, as it ensures cost-effectiveness and scalability.
* This is the correct recommendation.
* Option B: Use Panorama for firewall management and to transfer logs from the 500 firewalls directly to a third-party SIEM for centralized logging and reporting
* While third-party SIEM solutions can be integrated with Palo Alto Networks NGFWs, directly transferring logs from 500 firewalls to a SIEM can lead to bottlenecks and scalability issues.
Furthermore, relying on third-party solutions may not provide the same level of native integration as the Strata Logging Service.
* This is not the ideal recommendation.
* Option C: Highlight the efficiency of PAN-OS, which employs AI to automatically extract critical logs and generate daily executive reports, and confirm that the purchase of 500 NGFWs is sufficient
* While PAN-OS provides AI-driven insights and reporting, this option does not address the requirement for centralized logging and reporting. It also dismisses the need for additional infrastructure to handle logs from 500 firewalls.
* This is incorrect.
* Option D: Deploy a pair of M-1000 log collectors in the customer data center, and route logs from all 500 firewalls to the log collectors for centralized logging and reporting
* The M-1000 appliance is an on-premises log collector, but it has limitations in terms of scalability and storage capacity when compared to cloud-based options like the Strata Logging Service. Deploying only two M-1000 log collectors for 500 firewalls would result in potential performance and storage challenges.
* This is not the best recommendation.
References:
* Palo Alto Networks documentation on Panorama
* Strata Logging Service (Cortex Data Lake) overview in Palo Alto Networks Docs


NEW QUESTION # 54
A prospective customer is interested in Palo Alto Networks NGFWs and wants to evaluate the ability to segregate its internal network into unique BGP environments.
Which statement describes the ability of NGFWs to address this need?

  • A. It can be addressed by creating multiple eBGP autonomous systems.
  • B. It cannot be addressed because BGP must be fully meshed internally to work.
  • C. It cannot be addressed because PAN-OS does not support it.
  • D. It can be addressed with BGP confederations.

Answer: A

Explanation:
Segregating a network into unique BGP environments requires the ability to configure separateeBGP autonomous systems(AS) within the NGFW. Palo Alto Networks firewalls support advanced BGP features, including the ability to create and manage multiple autonomous systems.
* Why "It can be addressed by creating multiple eBGP autonomous systems" (Correct Answer B)?
PAN-OS supports the configuration of multiple eBGP AS environments. By creating unique eBGP AS numbers for different parts of the network, traffic can be segregated and routed separately. This feature is commonly used in multi-tenant environments or networks requiring logical separation for administrative or policy reasons.
* Each eBGP AS can maintain its own routing policies, neighbors, and traffic segmentation.
* This approach allows the NGFW to address the customer's need for segregated internal BGP environments.
* Why not "It cannot be addressed because PAN-OS does not support it" (Option A)?This statement is incorrect because PAN-OS fully supports BGP, including eBGP, iBGP, and features like route reflectors, confederations, and autonomous systems.
* Why not "It can be addressed with BGP confederations" (Option C)?While BGP confederations can logically group AS numbers within a single AS, they are generally used to simplify iBGP designs in very large-scale networks. They are not commonly used for segregating internal environments and are not required for the described use case.
* Why not "It cannot be addressed because BGP must be fully meshed internally to work" (Option D)?Full mesh iBGP is only required in environments without route reflectors. The described scenario does not mention the need for iBGP full mesh; instead, it focuses on segregated environments, which can be achieved with eBGP.


NEW QUESTION # 55
Which use case is valid for Palo Alto Networks Next-Generation Firewalls (NGFWs)?

  • A. Code-embedded NGFWs provide enhanced internet of things (IoT) security by allowing PAN-OS code to be run on devices that do not support embedded virtual machine (VM) images.
  • B. Serverless NGFW code security provides public cloud security for code-only deployments that do not leverage virtual machine (VM) instances or containerized services.
  • C. PAN-OS GlobalProtect gateways allow companies to run malware and exploit prevention modules on their endpoints without installing endpoint agents.
  • D. IT/OT segmentation firewalls allow operational technology resources in plant networks to securely interface with IT resources in the corporate network.

Answer: D

Explanation:
Palo Alto Networks Next-Generation Firewalls (NGFWs) provide robust security features across a variety of use cases. Let's analyze each option:
A: Code-embedded NGFWs provide enhanced IoT security by allowing PAN-OS code to be run on devices that do not support embedded VM images.
This statement is incorrect. NGFWs do not operate as "code-embedded" solutions for IoT devices. Instead, they protect IoT devices through advanced threat prevention, device identification, and segmentation capabilities.
B: Serverless NGFW code security provides public cloud security for code-only deployments that do not leverage VM instances or containerized services.
This is not a valid use case. Palo Alto NGFWs provide security for public cloud environments using VM- series firewalls, CN-series (containerized firewalls), and Prisma Cloud for securing serverless architectures.
NGFWs do not operate in "code-only" environments.
C: IT/OT segmentation firewalls allow operational technology (OT) resources in plant networks to securely interface with IT resources in the corporate network.
This is a valid use case. Palo Alto NGFWs are widely used in industrial environments to provide IT/OT segmentation, ensuring that operational technology systems in plants or manufacturing facilities can securely communicate with IT networks while protecting against cross-segment threats. Features like App-ID, User- ID, and Threat Prevention are leveraged for this segmentation.
D: PAN-OS GlobalProtect gateways allow companies to run malware and exploit prevention modules on their endpoints without installing endpoint agents.
This is incorrect. GlobalProtect gateways provide secure remote access to corporate networks and extend the NGFW's threat prevention capabilities to endpoints, but endpoint agents are required to enforce malware and exploit prevention modules.
Key Takeaways:
* IT/OT segmentation with NGFWs is a real and critical use case in industries like manufacturing and utilities.
* The other options describe features or scenarios that are not applicable or valid for NGFWs.
References:
* Palo Alto Networks NGFW Use Cases
* Industrial Security with NGFWs


NEW QUESTION # 56
......

The clients can consult our online customer service before and after they buy our Palo Alto Networks Systems Engineer Professional - Hardware Firewall guide dump. We provide considerate customer service to the clients. Before the clients buy our PSE-Strata-Pro-24 cram training materials they can consult our online customer service personnel about the products’ version and price and then decide whether to buy them or not. After the clients buy the PSE-Strata-Pro-24 study tool they can consult our online customer service about how to use them and the problems which occur during the process of using. If the clients fail in the test and require the refund our online customer service will reply their requests quickly and deal with the refund procedures promptly. In short, our online customer service will reply all of the clients’ questions about the PSE-Strata-Pro-24 cram training materials timely and efficiently.

PSE-Strata-Pro-24 PDF: https://www.exams-boost.com/PSE-Strata-Pro-24-valid-materials.html

Report this page